by
Socken, Paul, 1945- editor.
Call Number
809.911 23
Publication Date
2013
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
2.7935
by
Hoveyda, Fereydoun.
Call Number
302.23 21
Publication Date
2000
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.3554
View Other Search Results
by
Parmelee, John H., 1970-
Call Number
320.973014 23
Publication Date
2012
Summary
Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public, by John H. Parmelee and Shannon L. Bichard, is the first comprehensive examination of political Twitter use. Multiple methods and theories reveal why political leaders are followed, the persuasive power of political tweets, Twitter's effects on political polarization, and the significance of Twitter as a political innovation. Parmelee and Bichard's findings show Twitter has caused major changes in how people engage politically. Leaders' tweets are qui.
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.2513
by
Peursen, W. Th. van.
Call Number
801.9590285 22
Publication Date
2010
Summary
The spread of digital technology across philology, linguistics and literary studies suggests that text scholarship is taking on a more laboratory-like image. The ability to sort, quantify, reproduce and report text through computation would seem to facilitate the exploration of text as another type of quantitative scientific data. However, developing this potential also highlights text analysis and text interpretation as two increasingly separated sub-tasks in the study of texts. The implied dual nature of interpretation as the traditional, valued mode of scholarly text comparison, combined with an increasingly widespread reliance on digital text analysis as scientific mode of inquiry raises the question as to whether the reflexive concepts that are central to interpretation - individualism, subjectivity - are affected by the anonymised, normative assumptions implied by formal categorisations of text as digital data.
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.2406
Limit Search Results