Choice Review
Except for articles in literary or theater histories, or introductions to collections like DramaContemporary. Czechoslovakia, ed. by Marketa Goetz-Stankiewcz (1985), Burian's is the first survey of modern Czech theater. For this, it has value, particularly as a reference source on productions, dramaturges, playwrights, theaters, and companies. More useful would be an alphabetically arranged handbook or dictionary, because as a critical reflection the book is a disappointment. Burian (emer., Univ. of Albany) is driven by a morality allegory of good times and bad times depending on the political context, even though his comments about specific productions often contradict any neat schemata. For instance, under renewed Soviet hegemony, the 1980s are defined as a low point; nevertheless, Burian describes three remarkable productions and two stunning new playwrights in detail. And vice versa, the post-Velvet Revolution 1990s are called a period of ferment and rebirth, but the problems of financing theaters and the limited achievement of Bure%sova (discussed in depth) belie Burian's optimism. None of the discussions goes very deeply into its topics. To not discuss intersections between theater and cinema, even when the same personalities contributed to each, is another limitation. Recommend mainly as a reference tool; all levels. D. N. Mager; Johnson C. Smith University
Library Journal Review
This history traces the development of Czech theater since the advent of realism in the late 1800s. Burian (theater, Univ. of Albany) is a Czech migr who has periodically gone back following the invasion of Prague in 1968 to study theater. He focuses on theaters, directors, designers, and playwrights as they struggle to make Czech theater a force in European drama and a voice of democracy against the forces of fascism and communism. Czech political and artistic lives are more intimately connected than in other cultures. A few major figures are in the foreground of this study: designer Joseph Svoboda, playwrights Josef and Karel Capek, and, of course, Vaclav Havel, who embodies the artistic/political union of our time. Behind these figures are a great many secondary artists of high quality whose reputations have not traveled as well to the rest of Europe. Hard going for lay readers, this book is recommended for academic libraries and theater collections.DThomas E. Luddy, Salem State Coll., MA (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.