by
Alholm, Sarah E.
Call Number
362.11068 23
Publication Date
2010
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.4705
by
Miller, Phillip B.
Call Number
610.6950973 22
Publication Date
2010
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.7051
by
Reeves, Douglas B., 1953-
Call Number
371.200973 22
Publication Date
2009
Summary
Guide for becoming a leader in making changes in the educational field.
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
1.2951
by
Saunders, Elijah.
Call Number
616.132008996073 22
Publication Date
2009
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
47544.9531
by
O'Leary, Rosemary, 1955-
Call Number
351.973 22
Publication Date
2009
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.0615
by
Haddow, George D.
Call Number
363.3480973 22
Publication Date
2008
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
49104.9531
by
Dixon, Lloyd S.
Call Number
368.48 22
Publication Date
2007
Summary
Concerned that the unavailability of terrorism insurance would impede economic recovery and hinder growth after the 9/11 attacks, Congress passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA). TRIA will sunset at the end of 2007 unless Congress takes further action. This book examines the implications of allowing TRIA to expire and of enhancements aimed at improving the availability and affordability of insurance for nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological (NBCR) attacks. The analysis takes a systematic approach to addressing the deep uncertainties that underlie the market for terrorism insurance and is the first study of TRIA to consider not just taxpayer payments through the program but also the cost of government compensation and assistance following a terrorist attack when analyzing the program's effect on government spending. The authors conclude that taxpayer cost is lower with TRIA than without TRIA across a broad range of assumptions about attack frequency and the proportion of uninsured losses that are compensated postattack. The analysis also cautions policymakers to be careful when modifying the program to better address NBCR attacks: Simply expanding the program to require insurers to offer NBCR coverage may not achieve the desired outcomes. The authors identify program changes that will produce positive results for both NBCR and conventional attacks that are robust to key underlying uncertainties.
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
574.6224
by
Loughran, David S., 1969- author.
Call Number
343.730946 22
Publication Date
2007
Summary
Are older drivers posing an increasing risk to the public? If they are, what options should policymakers consider to mitigate that risk? This research offers a new perspective on these questions. Using an innovative approach to estimate the extent to which older drivers are on the road and their riskiness compared with drivers of other age groups, the study finds that older drivers (those 65 and older) are slightly (16 percent) likelier than drivers aged 25 to 64 to cause an accident and that they pose much less risk to the public than do drivers aged 18 to 24, who are nearly three times likelier than older drivers to cause an accident. However, because of their greater frailty, older drivers are much likelier than other drivers are much likelier than other drivers to be seriously injured or killed when involved in an accident. In light of these findings, the authors find little support for the idea that stricter licensing policies targeting older drivers would substantially improve traffic safety.
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.4261
by
Christianson, Jon B.
Call Number
362.11 22
Publication Date
2007
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.0737
by
Piotrowski, Suzanne J., 1973-
Call Number
352.3670973 22
Publication Date
2007
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.4078
by
Institute for Career Research.
Call Number
610.69023 22
Publication Date
2007
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
38035.4336
by
Colby, William H., 1955-
Call Number
179.7 22
Publication Date
2006
Format:
Electronic Resources
Relevance:
0.0737
Limit Search Results
Narrowed by: