par
Uitz, Renáta.
Numéro de rayon préféré
347.012 22
Date de publication
2005
Résumé
Emphasizes the role history and historical narratives play in constitutional adjudication. Uitz provocatively draws attention to the often-tense relationship between the constitution and historical precedence highlighting the interpretive and normative nature of the law. Her work seeks to understand the conditions under which references to the past, history and traditions are attractive to lawyers, even when they have the potential of perpetuating indeterminacy in constitutional reasoning. Uitz conclusively argues that this constitutional indeterminacy is obscured by 'judicial rhetorical toolkits' of continuity and reconciliation that allow the court's reliance on the past to be unaccounted for. Uitz' rigorous analysis and extensive research makes this work an asset to legal scholars and practitioners alike. The inquiry in this volume hopes to attract observers of constitutional adjudication, may they be reading constitutional jurisprudence from the quarters of constitutional law, constitutional history, political science or history departments.
Format :
Ressources électroniques
Pertinence:
0.0615
Voir d’autres résultats de recherche
par
Sajó, András.
Numéro de rayon préféré
342 22
Date de publication
2003
Format :
Ressources électroniques
Pertinence:
0.0598
Voir d’autres résultats de recherche
Limiter les résultats de recherche
Affiner par :