Search Results for Strategic planning - Narrowed by: United States -- Military policy. SirsiDynix Enterprise https://wait.sdp.sirsidynix.net.au/client/en_US/WAILRC/WAILRC/qu$003dStrategic$002bplanning$0026qf$003dSUBJECT$002509Subject$002509United$002bStates$002b--$002bMilitary$002bpolicy.$002509United$002bStates$002b--$002bMilitary$002bpolicy.$0026ps$003d300?dt=list 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z Thinking about America's defense [electronic resource] : an analytical memoir / Glenn A. Kent ; with David Ochmanek, Michael Spirtas, Bruce R. Pirnie. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:234716 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;Kent, Glenn A., 1915-<br/>Call Number&#160;355.033073 22<br/>Publication Date&#160;2008<br/>Summary&#160;&quot;Lieutenant General Glenn A. Kent was a uniquely acute analyst and developer of American defense policy in the second half of the twentieth century. His 33-year career in the Air Force was followed by more than 20 years as one of the leading analysts at RAND. This volume is not a memoir in the normal sense but rather a summary of the dozens of national security issues in which Glenn was personally engaged over the course of his career. These issues included creating the single integrated operational plan (SIOP), leading DoD's official assessment of strategic defenses in the 1960s, developing and analyzing strategic nuclear arms control agreements, helping to bring new weapon systems to life, and many others. Each vignette describes the analytical frameworks and, where appropriate, the mathematical formulas and charts that Glenn developed and applied to gain insights into the issue at hand. The author also relates his roles in much of the bureaucratic pulling and hauling that occurred as issues were addressed within the government.&quot;--Publisher's website.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=304915">Click here to view</a><br/> Recasting NATO's strategic concept [electronic resource] : possible directions for the United States / Christopher S. Chivvis. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:240196 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;Chivvis, Christopher S.<br/>Call Number&#160;355.031091821 22<br/>Publication Date&#160;2009<br/>Summary&#160;&quot;To address its security challenges, the United States needs the active support of its allies. This means, in particular, ensuring that the states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) remain able and willing to make a contribution to resolving their common security problems wherever possible. The revision of NATO's strategic concept offers an excellent opportunity to further this aim. It is a chance to build consensus about the future and thereby steer the alliance in a direction that will help keep it relevant. This paper examines five possible directions--refocus on Europe, new focus on the greater Middle East, focus on fragile states, focus on nonstate threats, and a global alliance of liberal democracies--the alliance might adopt, assessing them against certain key political and military criteria. It offers those involved in the rewrite both a range of potential options and a preliminary assessment of the feasibility and potential implications of each. The purpose is to encourage debate around the major, concrete problems that member states face.&quot;--RAND web site.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=314474">Click here to view</a><br/> How 9/11 changed our ways of war / edited by James Burk. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:261300 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;Burk, James, 1948-<br/>Call Number&#160;355.033573 23<br/>Publication Date&#160;2013<br/>Summary&#160;Following the 9/11 attacks, a war against al Qaeda by the U.S. and its liberal democratic allies was next to inevitable. But what kind of war would it be, how would it be fought, for how long, and what would it cost in lives and money? None of this was known at the time. What came to be known was that the old ways of war must change-but how?Now, with over a decade of political decision-making and warfighting to analyze, How 9/11 Changed Our Ways of War addresses that question. In particular it assesses how well those ways of war, adapted to fight terrorism, affect our milit.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=713408">Click here to view</a><br/> Changes ahead : future directions for the U.S. overseas military presence / Richard L. Kugler ; prepared for the U.S. Air Force by RAND's Project Air Force. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:219799 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;Kugler, Richard L.<br/>Call Number&#160;358.41357 21<br/>Publication Date&#160;1998<br/>Summary&#160;U.S. military forces stationed abroad play vital roles. As regional political and military dynamics shift, so too will the United States need to adjust its overseas military posture to accommodate new objectives and missions in new places. In general, that posture will need to become more flexible and more expeditionary, covering a wider array of challenges and broader geographic areas. Such changes can be unsettling to accomplish and may even worry allies and friends. Yet the United States cannot adequately reassure foreign countries with an outdated force posture. Planning for these changes should not be based on marginal adjustments to arbitrary manpower levels but should assess strategic objectives, missions, and requirements before considering the implications for manpower, units, activities, and money. This planning also should establish coherent goals and orderly means of reaching them, rather than muddle along in incremental ways that lack direction or can be blown off course by the shifting political winds. This study offers eight options that can be used to help guide thinking and planning for the coming era of change.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=48005">Click here to view</a><br/> The U.S. Army and the new national security strategy / edited by Lynn Davis and Jeremy Shapiro. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:223918 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;Davis, Lynn E. (Lynn Etheridge), 1943-<br/>Call Number&#160;355.00973 22<br/>Publication Date&#160;2003<br/>Summary&#160;How is the U.S. Army changing to fulfill its role in light of the new national security strategy? How must it change further to better accomplish its manifold and varied missions? How did the attacks of September 11, 2001, alter or accelerate the need for change? Is the Army's far-reaching program for change known as the Army Transformation on the right track? Fourteen RAND analysts with broad experience in strategic and Army planning have undertaken to answer these questions. In this book, the authors use nine chapters to examine the Army's role in the offensive war on terrorism; the Army's homeland security needs; the implications for the Army of the increase in emphasis on the Asia-Pacific region; the Army's role in coalition operations; the unfinished business of jointness-the lessons to be learned from recent Army operations and how the Army can better prepare for the future; the Army's deployability, logistical, and personnel challenges; and whether the Army can afford the Transformation as currently envisaged. These chapters are bracketed by a concise introduction, a description of the new national security strategy and the Army's place in it, and a succinct summary of the authors' conclusions. This book is nothing less than a call for the Army to change and a prescription for what needs to be done.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=81669">Click here to view</a><br/> Foundations of effective influence operations [electronic resource] : a framework for enhancing Army capabilities / Eric V. Larson [and others]. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:238112 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;Larson, Eric V. (Eric Victor), 1957-<br/>Call Number&#160;355.41 22<br/>Publication Date&#160;2009<br/>Summary&#160;The authors aim to assist the U.S. Army in understanding &quot;influence operations,&quot; capabilities that may allow the United States to effectively influence the attitudes and behavior of particular foreign audiences while minimizing or avoiding combat. The book identifies approaches, methodologies, and tools that may be useful in planning, executing, and assessing influence operations.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=296745">Click here to view</a><br/> Ideas as weapons [electronic resource] : influence and perception in modern warfare / edited by G.J. David, Jr., and T.R. McKeldin III ; foreword by H.R. McMaster. ent://SD_ILS/0/SD_ILS:251204 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z 2024-05-13T23:00:48Z by&#160;David, G. J.<br/>Call Number&#160;355.343 22<br/>Publication Date&#160;2009<br/>Summary&#160;&quot;The United States has struggled to define its approach to what has been termed the &quot;information battlefield&quot; since the dawn of the information era. Yet with the outbreak of the war on terrorism, the United States is being violently challenged to take a position and react to militants' use of emerging information technology. Ideological demigods operating against the United States now have unprecedented channels by which to disseminate their message to those uncertain, sympathetic, or actively engaged in their philosophy. From the caves of southeastern Afghanistan to the streets of Baghdad, &quot;the message&quot; has dominated the thinking of those who perpetrate horrific acts of violence, whether in the name of ideology, ethnic and sectarian partisanship, or religion.&quot; &quot;This book seeks to illuminate the uses of information in armed conflict by juxtaposing the views of those who engage in manipulating information against the historic context. The anthology is divided into four sections: geopolitical, strategic, operational, and tactical. The geopolitical perspective is that dominated by world politics, diplomacy, and the elements of national power excluding military force. The strategic view examines where the violence has begun and the military element of power that has become a major contributing factor. The operational perspective handles the campaigns to accomplish a specific purpose on the world stage- for example, the Iraq campaign. Finally, the tactical level takes into account the individual and the individual clashes within the campaigns at issue. Because the nexus of information conflict is most easily viewed in the world's contemporary violent confrontations, this anthology is heavily weighted toward military personnel who have managed these difficult issues.&quot;--Jacket.<br/>Format:&#160;Electronic Resources<br/><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=e900xww&AN=388746">Click here to view</a><br/>